Roles, Signers, Integrations
Protected.
$3.31B was stolen last year — not through code bugs, but compromised keys, weak multisig setups, and phished signers. We expose those hidden single points of failure in any on-chain infrastructure.
01 / The Gap
Fill the security gaps between code and operations.
Code bugsEconomic exploitsIntegration bugsUpgrades correctness
LayerContracts
Audit
Audit
Smart-contract auditors built strong fundamentals around static code analysis, formal verification, and economic invariant review. But it covers only 20% of actual risk — ±80% of DeFi theft comes from infrastructure and operational failures.
Ownership posture3rd-party setup securityHidden single points of failure
The GlueSTABILYTICS
The majority of recent hacks happened in neither layer.
Stabilytics exists to close this gap — the glue between static code review and traditional operational security.
Keys managementAccess controlTreasury operationsTech dependencies
LayerOpSec
Audit
Audit
OpSec auditors bring decades of battle-tested traditional security discipline — ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST, key ceremonies, IAM hardening, supply-chain hygiene. They make sure the people, infrastructure, and processes around the code follow institutional security standards.
02 / The Stakes
Why this matters — right now.
60+On-chain hacks · 2026 YTD
29 in April alone — and the head of an iceberg.Most weren't pure code bugs.
North Korea doesn't hack code. They hack people. Your smart-contract audit has never tested for that. We do.
03 / Outcomes
What you walk away with.
Full posture map of your live deployment
Every privileged role, signer, and 3rd-party integration — classified, risk-scored, and pinned to exact on-chain addresses. No vague categories.
Prioritized fix plan your team can ship
Specific addresses, thresholds, config changes, and timelock deltas — ranked by impact so the highest-risk changes ship first.
A verifiable report you can publish
PDF + permanent web URL. Structured to be forwarded to investors, LPs, partners, and exchanges — no redaction needed.
04 / Method
Human-accountable. Peer-reviewed.
We use AI, scanners, and modern tooling to find candidates fast — but a human engineer owns every finding and severity call, and every Critical and High is independently peer-reviewed by a second engineer before the report reaches you.
05 / Engagement
How it works.
01ScopeContracts, roles, integrations
02AnalyzeTooling + manual review
03Fix findingsWith your team
04ReportPDF + URL
06 / Coverage
How we cover it — three pillars.
Roles & Power Distribution
- Every privileged role on every contract
- EOAs vs. multisigs vs. timelocks, mapped
- Concentration risk scored per role
If any single key holds disproportionate power, you'll know.
Signer Trust Analysis
- Threshold logic vs. real-world coercion risk
- Signer overlap across orgs and chains
- Phishing, deepfake, and bribery vectors
If your multisig design has a soft target, you'll know.
Integration Verification
- Bridges, oracles, DeFi — checked
- Default configs vs. hardened configs
- Upstream supply-chain exposure
If your defaults are dangerous, you'll know.
08 / FAQ
Audits & security — common questions.
What is a Live Infrastructure Audit?
A Live Infrastructure Audit is a security review of a protocol's deployed, on-chain state — not its source code. Stabilytics maps every privileged role, signer, and third-party integration on your live deployment, then risk-scores the exposure that smart-contract audits never test: compromised keys, weak multisig setups, and dangerous default configurations.
How is a Stabilytics audit different from a smart contract audit?
A smart contract audit reviews source code for bugs before deployment; a Stabilytics audit reviews the live deployment after it ships. Code audits cover roughly 20% of real-world risk — an estimated 80% of DeFi losses come from infrastructure and operational failures such as compromised keys, phished signers, and misconfigured bridges that no code audit is scoped to catch. Stabilytics is the security layer between code review and traditional operational security.
What does a Stabilytics security audit cover?
Every engagement covers three pillars: Roles & Power Distribution (every owner, admin, upgrader, and pauser address mapped per chain and scored for concentration risk), Signer Trust Analysis (multisig thresholds versus real-world coercion, signer overlap across orgs and chains, and phishing or bribery vectors), and Third-Party Integration Verification (LayerZero, Chainlink CCIP, Circle CCTP, Wormhole, oracles, and upgrade proxies checked against a hardened-security baseline instead of vendor defaults).
Who needs a Live Infrastructure Audit?
Any protocol holding user funds on-chain — RWAs, stablecoin issuers, DeFi protocols, and cross-chain bridges. If your protocol relies on multisigs, privileged admin roles, or third-party integrations like LayerZero or oracles, a Live Infrastructure Audit surfaces the hidden single points of failure that attackers target after your code has already been audited.
How long does a security audit take, and what does it cost?
A typical engagement runs 1–6 weeks depending on the number of chains, multisigs, and integrations in scope. Payment is in USDC or fiat, net 14. Every Critical and High finding is tracked to remediation or formal acceptance before the final report is delivered.
What do I receive at the end of the audit?
A verifiable report you can publish — delivered as a PDF, a permanent web URL, and Markdown source. It includes a full posture map of your live deployment pinned to exact on-chain addresses, plus a prioritized fix plan with specific thresholds and configuration changes ranked by impact. It's structured to forward to investors, LPs, exchanges, and integration partners as proof of security diligence.
Are findings produced by AI or reviewed by humans?
Human-accountable and peer-reviewed. Stabilytics uses AI, scanners, and modern tooling to find candidates fast, but a human engineer owns every finding and severity call, and every Critical and High is independently peer-reviewed by a second engineer before the report reaches you.
Do you audit LayerZero and cross-chain bridge security?
Yes. Bridge and cross-chain messaging configuration is a core part of every engagement, and LZCheck — our free LayerZero V2 tool — verifies DVN configuration, peers, ownership, and library health for any OApp or OFT in seconds. The Kelp DAO incident ($290M) stemmed from a default 1-of-1 DVN configuration — exactly the class of misconfiguration this analysis is built to catch.
Protection
Find every weak link before they do.
LZCheck surfaces ownership and DVN risks on-chain. Full Stabilytics coverage maps every social engineering vector and hidden single point of failure across your entire project.